Sunday, August 1, 2010

Music and Memory, Part 11: Song of Love

A family event brought me back to New York City this weekend, and my schedule permitted me, while on my way to the event, to pop in at my old university for a bit of practice in the music department.  I have a gig in Boston in a few months' time, singing the kind of virtuosic music that my career at one time was based upon, and I am conscious of having to work in specific ways to be able to sing it creditably once again.  While practicing, I recalled how, when my knack for singing florid music was discovered by my teachers and coaches, and I began to exploit it, I thought it would save me somehow.  I might not be the best singer in the world, I thought at the time, but I can do this special thing that many of my peers cannot; and it became not so much a badge of honor in my craft as a musician, as a weapon of assault in my battle to carve out a life for myself as an artist.  When my first marriage ended, and when, not long after, the World Trade Center was attacked, that artistic quest stuttered and stumbled.  I applied to my doctoral program, and after being admitted, took the opportunity to turn away from the virtuosic music that had gained me a small reputation, and towards the music that spoke the most deeply to me, but which I doubted I would ever be hired to perform, music that can best be described as non-virtuosic, even deliberately anti-virtuosic.

My oral exams dictated that I present before a panel of professors on a piece that I had sung in the second of the three recitals required by my program, and I chose Schumann's famous song cycle Frauenliebe und -Leben -- A Woman's Love and Life (I have the recording of that recital, and consider it to be one of my most convincing performances).  Frauenliebe is based on poetry by Adalbert von Chamisso, whose publication of the poems in book form in 1830 caused a small sensation; young women in particular inundated the poet with correspondence, amazed that a man had apparently been able to unlock the language of a woman's heart and express it so faithfully.  The poems Schumann chose for the cycle tell the story of a young woman who falls in love, marries, has a child, and suffers the death of her husband, and his song cycle is truly cyclical, a sort of closed circle like a wedding ring, ending with the same music -- the theme "Seit ich ihn gesehen" -- with which it begins.  One of the many remarkable things about Frauenliebe is that alone among the great German Romantic song cycles of the nineteenth century, it is sung from the point of view of a woman.  While the famous "male" cycles -- for instance, Schubert's Winterreise, Schumann's Liederkreis, and Mahler's Lieder eines fahrenden Gesellen -- all address the issue of striking out into the world, and trying -- and failing -- to negotiate one's way in it, Frauenliebe takes place in inner space, in the interior of both the home and the heart.

When I was a young singer on various singer listservs, there was a good deal of discussion about Frauenliebe.  Some principled sopranos and mezzos (the piece has a low tessitura and, though it can be sung by sopranos, it's more commonly done by mezzos) declared that they would never, ever sing it.  They deemed it rather appallingly sexist:  the woman's first statement is "Since I first laid eyes on him, I seem to be blind"; when the unnamed beloved proposes to her (offstage, as it were), she cannot believe that princely he has chosen lowly her; she sings an ode to her engagement ring, explaining that it has given her a purpose and saved her from a life that would otherwise have been an endless expanse of barren waste.  (Some of these same thoughtful singers also declared Aaron Copland's arrangement of the old American song "I Bought Me a Cat" off-limits, for its last verse, "I bought me a wife, my wife pleased me/I fed my wife under yonder tree," etc. )

When I was preparing my arguments for my final doctoral exams, I did a great deal of research on Frauenliebe, on Schumann, and on his wife Clara (above), the great pianist who was also a composer in her own right.  I found out some interesting things:  for instance, pace the principled women on the singer listservs who eschewed the piece, it was also sung by men in the nineteenth century, notably by the prominent German baritone Julius Stockhausen.  And I came upon a concert program that Clara Schumann had performed with some colleagues after Robert's death, in which she split up the cycle, interspersing its eight songs with other works by her husband.  In my orals, I also addresed what I believed was an undercurrent of Christian mysticism in the piece, and indeed, some commentators have noted both Marian and quietistic themes in the cycle.  I was nine months pregnant at the time, and was busting out of a clingy gray maternity dress that I had never worn before, the kind that looks cute on the internet, but turns out to be somewhat bizarrely fetishistic when you put it on, but by then you're out the door and it's too late, because you have a date with destiny. 

All of this went through my mind in the solitude of the practice room yesterday.  I was delighted to be there, in the bowels of the place where I had spent some of my happiest years, and where I gained one of the deepest feelings of connection -- to my craft and to my life -- that I had ever received.  Nonetheless, it was a bit jarring to be practicing virtuosic music in the place where I had begun to embrace music that was its aesthetic and even its ethical opposite.

Coincidentally, I recently watched the 1947 film "Song of Love," which stars Katharine Hepburn as Clara Schumann and Paul Henreid as Robert; Robert Walker also appears as the sensitive young Johannes Brahms, secretly in love with the efficient, angelic Clara.  The film fudges the details about the complicated relationships between Robert and Clara, between the Schumanns and Brahms, and between the Schumanns and Liszt, among other things.  However, one of its main themes is the contrast of virtuosity -- in the movie, construed as soulless, empty, morally suspect -- with the deliberate practice of anti-virtuosity espoused by the Schumanns.  There is a wonderful scene in which Clara sets forth her manifesto of pure music before the virtuoso pianist (and relentless womanizer) Franz Liszt while playing her husband's song "Widmung" (Dedication) -- right after Liszt has performed his own bravura variations upon it.  The young man who says, "Such technique, Mr. Liszt; I don't know what to say," is Brahms, also a great pianist -- who in real life fell asleep the first time he heard Liszt play.  It is interesting that Liszt calls Clara "the reigning saint of music," because the mid-century cult of anti-virtuosity, of simplicity in music, was, like much in the Romantic movement, indeed an attempt to find truth, purity, and the essence of the spiritual in art.

Hepburn's piano playing was dubbed by Artur Rubinstein, uncredited.  Here is Rubinstein/Hepburn playing Schumann's beautiful "Träumerei," a piece which both begins and ends the film, as Schumann's "Seit ich ihn gesehen" both begins and ends Frauenliebe und -Leben.  It could serve as the theme song of Romantic anti-virtuosity; "Träumerei" is the most famous piece from Schumanns Kinderszenen -- Scenes from Childhood -- and is a fitting anthem for the ethos of simplicity and purity and the Romantic striving after what is essential and true, but which will always elude us on this earth.
 
Here is the late, lamented Lorraine Hunt Lieberson singing "Seit ich ihn gesehen," no. 1 from Frauenliebe.  It is a marvelous performance, and really captures the ethos of Romantic simplicity.  The text and translation can be found here.

11 comments:

Rodak said...

Oh, Pentimento, your blog is such an education. You open a world for me about which I know virtually nothing. And I know nothing about it because nobody has previously made me want to know something about it. I've barely scratched the surface of this post, but I must find the time to do so. Thanks, so much.

Pentimento said...

Thanks, Rodak -- I hope when you've scratched the surface, you find it worthwhile.

mrsdarwin said...

I have so little time these days, it seems, but I'm looking forward to having a chance to listen to this music and watch these clips.

I'm especially interested in the idea of non-virtuosic singing. When my sister came to visit me, she practiced with our schola, which sings a great deal of chant. She is trained in an operatic style of singing, and had a bit of trouble wrapping her voice around the chant. She wanted to weight certain notes or hang onto words in a way that would have made sense for the music she'd been rehearsing, but which didn't marry with the simplicity of the chant. I suppose chant is the original non-virtuosic music.

Pentimento said...

I loved "Song of Love," Mrs. D., though Katharine Hepburn's Scarsdale accent doesn't really travel well.

You bring up a good point about chant and anti-virtuosity. Chant and -- I'm going to go all grad school now -- performativity (yes, a real scholarly-jargon word!) are sort of antithetical in nature. Chant is not meant to be *performed*, in the way that your sister and I are trained to approach music. I sometimes feel torn when I hear recordings of real monastics singing chant, because I think it could be more beautiful aesthetically, but there are valid objections also to chant being performed in concert settings.

It sounds like your sister sang very musically -- she wanted to emphasize the meaning of certain words and phrases by bringing them out in the musical texture, as she probably would do very effectively in concert repertoire. It would be hard for me to resist the temptation too.

Enbrethiliel said...

+JMJ+

I remember watching/listening to an amateur singer attempting I'd Give My Life for You from the musical Miss Saigon. It was going very well until, out of nowhere, came a riff. I was appalled. It just took me out of the moment and made it about the singer rather than about her character.

The commenters seemed to agree. I think the highest rated comment was, "You don't riff Kim!"

Pentimento said...

The problem with virtuosity. as you suggest, E., is that it often doesn't convey anything musically or textually or dramatically. Virtuosic excess has often been the catalyst for musical reform, at one period even spurring the birth of opera in the late sixteenth century.

Enbrethiliel said...

+JMJ+

Pentimento, when you wrote "virtuosic excess," I thought of American Idol! To my untrained ear, virtuosity has more to do with the singer's personality than with his skill or the music itself--and that about sums up the show for me, too.

Pentimento said...

I think I've only seen the show once, E., but there's a lot of *technical* virtuosic excess in pop music today too, mainly in soul music -- there's that ubiquitous melismatic thing which I really can't stand because it means nothing except "look at me," or, better, "listen to me."

John said...

Enjoyed your column so much. One correction - the piece that Rubinstein played for "Liszt and Clara" was Widmung, not Traumerei.

John said...

Enjoyed your column so much. One correction - the piece that Rubinstein played for "Liszt and Clara" was Widmung, not Traumerei.

Pentimento said...

Thank you, John.

But please read, and listen/watch, again, and you will see that I identified the first piece -- played by Rubinstein-as-Hepburn in the first video clip, in which Hepburn delivers her anti-virtuosity manifesto to Liszt -- as "Widmung." I identified the second piece, in the second video clip, near the bottom of the post, as "Traümerei."